|
Huns
Origins Of The Huns
Linguistic
Explorations
The Huns vs Eastern
Hu Nomads
Modu's Hun Empire
and Early Han Dynasty
Huns & the
Latter Han Dynasty
Huns During Wei-Jinn
Time Periods
Hunnic Han &
Zhao Dynasty (AD 304-329)
Five Nomad Groups
Ravaging China
Toba's Wei Dynasty,
Ruruans, & Hunnic Decline
Descriptions of
Non-Mongolian Physiques
Attila the Hun
Roman Legions Under Huns & Living In China
Distinction From The Turks & Uygurs
Uygurs & Karlaks vs Orkhon Turks
Uygurs vs Kirghiz
Distinction From "White Huns (Hephthalites)"
Yüeh-chih, Scythians, & Ye-tai (White Huns) |
|
Descriptions of Non-Mongolian
Physiques |
Descriptions of Non-Mongolian
Physiques
Non-Mongolian physiques did
exist among Chinese as a result of Chinese interaction with Hunnish,
Turkic and Mongol peoples during the course of history. As history
had recorded, various steppe people, at certain points, had been
recorded to be people carrying different features as to hair, nose,
eye and skin. Hunnish, Turkic and Mongol peoples, however, should be
considered more Mongoloid peoples than else, and they had acted as a
kind of buffer in between Mongoloid and Caucasoid peoples since
prehistory. To clarify Chinese ethnic continuity, I also expounded
Huangdi's ethnicity in related discussions, like in prehistory.htm
section. I had cited Prof Wei Chu-Hsien's interpretation of ancient
classics Shi-zi (approx 338 BC works) in authenticating the
ethnicity about barbarians in four directions: Guan-xiong-guo in the
south, Chang-gu-guo (Chang-gong? long arm) in the west, Shen-mu-guo
(deep eye socket) in the north, and Yuhu and Yujing as east-sea and
north-sea seagods. Here, I will, once and for all, settle the issues
in regards to Huangdi or the Yellow Overlord, i.e., i) semantic
error in translating the overlord for 'di4' into emperor; ii) Nordic
racist appropriation in attaching Caucasian tag to Huangdi. I will
use Shi-zi's record of deep eye socket people to the north of
Huangdi as a corrobaration that Huangdi people were not of
deep-socket eyes at all. In the paragraph on the origin of Huns, I
had also expounded the ethnic nature of various Rong people as
mainly Sino-Tibetan speaking Qiangic people.
I would make a claim here that the Huns were semi-sinicized people
who had lived along the Chinese border for thousands of years, and
the Huns were much more civilized than the later Jurchens and
Mongols. My speculation is that the ancient Chinese could have much
in common with the Huns. I would also cast doubts on the nature of
the Huns under Attila who invaded Europe. Because the European
historians stated that those Huns who first invaded Europe were so
barbaric that they did not eat cooked foods at all. The Atilla Huns
do not sound like their Asian kinsmen. The early Chinese historical
accounts did not have much hint as to the physique of the Huns. That
is probably to do with my speculation that the ancient Chinese of
2000 years ago might not be different from the Huns at all.
Early Chinese historical accounts did record the difference in the
physique of peoples in Chinese Turkistan and beyond. Earlier records
said the people to the west of the ancient Gaochang Statelet
(Turpan) possessed the features of high nose bridge and deep socket
eyes. Records also stated that the people beyond the Pamir Mountains
possessed high nose bridge and hairy skins. Later accounts mentioned
the existence of 'blue-appled' people in southern Chinese Turkistan.
(Chinese character for 'blue', namely, 'bi', could also mean 'dark
green'.)
In Mongolia, Kirghiz people, descendants of Jiankun Statelet located
to the northwest of Siberia, were recorded to be a group of people
who had 'green eyes'. Kirghiz, with the help of a traitor Huihu
(Uygur) general, defeated and expelled Huihe from Mongolia around AD
840s. Chinese history recorded that the northern Mongolians
possessed 'chestnut-colored eyes'. The Mongolians of 13-14th
centuries classify the rest of nomadic peoples as 'Se Mu Ren',
namely, 'color-eyed peoples'. It would be in Ming Dynasty's history
book that we found descriptions of modern Europeans, namely,
'cat-eyed', 'eagle-mouthed', and 'red-haired'. Interestingly, Ming
Chinese did not talk too much about the Portugese who were known as
'Falangji' (a word mutated from 'Frank' and also meant for cannons
that Arabs mimicked on basis of European inventions), while the
Dutch was nicknamed 'Hongmaogui', namely, red-haired ghosts. In this
sense, the Portugese could appear much more different than the
Dutch, and it made sense if the Portugese sailors were mostly
Italians who enjoyed relatively darker hair and skin than northern
Europeans.
The relationship between Chinese and nomads was very much
interwined. The first recorded defection to the Huns would be the
son of King Zang Tu of Yan Principality in late 3rd century BC.
(King Zang Tu was conferred the king title by General Xiang Yu, not
Emeperor Liu Bang the first emperor of Han Dynasty.) The son of Zang
Tu later instigated the rebellion and defection of King Lu Wan of
Yan Principality. (Lu Wan was a childhood pal of Emperor Liu Bang,
and Liu Bang conferred him the title of king as an appreciation of
their childhood friendship after defeating the rebellion of King
Zang Tu.) Before Lu Wan' defection, King of Haan(2) Principality,
Xin, failed to resist the Huns and surrendered to the Huns for fear
of punishment by Liu Bang. The prime minister of Dai Principality,
Chen Xi, also fled to the Huns. So to say that quite some Chinese
kings and officials had joined hands with the Huns during the early
years of Han Dynasty ( 206 BC-23 AD). Han Emperor Wudi, who reigned
from 141 to 87 B.C., would campaign against the Huns several times.
Some generals under Wudi, like General Li Ling (the grandson of
General Li Guang), had surrendered to the Huns. Certainly, many Huns
and their nobles were taken prisoners or surrendered to the Han
Chinese, too. The son of one Hunnic king, Jin-Ridi, would later be
appointed a post in the Chinese court, and he would be responsible
for maintaining Liu family heritage of the Han Dynasty during
several palace struggles.
Tribal empires rose and fell, the conquered and the conquerors mixed
up, and ethnic and linguistic dividing lines blurred. Notable would
be the fact that the so-called Indo-European nomads, Scythians ('Sai
Ren' or 'Sai Zhong' People) and Yuezhi (Yüeh-chih), had migrated to
Oxus (ancient Kuei or Gui River) and the Iranian world a long time
ago. It would be during the Western Jinn (AD 265-316) that
historical accounts record extensively the difference of the
physique of the nomads from the Chinese. Those descriptions are
mostly to do with the Xianbei nomads whose ancestors were driven to
Manchuria by the Huns. When an Eastern Jinn minister (Wang Dun)
rebelled against Emperor Mingdi in AD 322-325, he called the emperor
by a derogatory name of "Huangxu-nu of Xianbei", meaning
"yellow-haired slave of the Xianbei nomads". (Mingdi's mother was
from the Dai prefecture, i.e., Yanmen'guan Pass area, and my
interpretation would be to take ancient Chinese color of yellow as
brown. Dark brown hair is very common among today's northern
Chinese.) Emperor Fu Jian of Anterior Qin Dynasty (AD 351-394)
called the Xianbei rebels 'Bai Lu', namely, light-skinned enemies.
(In the eyes of the Qiang1/Di1 people, northerners like Xianbei
might possess lighter skin. Today's Tibetans and Qiangs in Sichuan
do possess darker-complexions. Using modern science, we could
attribute the shade difference among southern and northern
Mongolians to different levels of unltra-violet exposure.) As to the
Jiehu, they were said to have possessed higher nose bridge than the
others. Shi Min, an adopted son of Jiehu's Posterior Zhao, had at
one time killed about 200,000 Jiehu nomads. History said that Shi
Min's armies killed those people who looked like Jiehu because of
high nose bridge. Jiehu was an alternative race of the Huns, but
they must have looked the same to other Huns and Chinese except for
the high nose bridge. History recorded that the criteria used for
sorting out Jiehu was the nose bridge, only. (Jiehu founder, Shi Le,
was said to have travelled out of his domain to seek for employment
or career in his early years. Shi Le was at one time captured in
today's Shandong Province when the local Jinn warlord was given
advice to round up Hu nomads for filling up the army ranks. This
points to the kind of melting-pot as existed in late Jinn time
periods.)
16 Nations (AD 304-420) were comprised of various nomadic groups of
people, Huns, Jiehu, Xianbei (including Wuhuan & Toba), Qiang, & Di.
Ultimately, the Tobas, who were of Xianbei heritage, took over
northern China. Leftover Huns were absorbed by Ruruans, and Ruruans
were defeated and exterminated by Turks. Tobas would deal with the
onslaughts by the Ruruans first and then the Turks. Tobas got
sinicized in northern China. Ultimately, Toba Wei Dynasty would be
usurped by two generals of Xianbei heritage. By Sui Dynasty (AD
581-618), Turks would replace their Ruruan masters as the strongest
power in the northern steppe.
Ashina Turks might have possessed features different from other
Huns. In the 17th year of Western Wei's Datong era, i.e., AD 551,
Turkic Khan Tumen (Bumin) obtained Toba Princess Changle as a bride.
In the first year of Western Wei Emperor Feidi, Tumen defeated the
Ruruans and Tumen declared himself Khan Yili. Tumen's son, named
Keluo, was Khan Yixiji, and he would defeat Ruruan Khan's brother
(Dengshuzi). Yixiji's brother, Sijin (Sinjibu?), aka Yandu, would
succeed Khan Yixiji as Khan Muchu. Sijin was recorded to be
red-faced and possess liuli [brown] eyes. In the 7th century, there
was record in regards to the difference of Ashina Turks from the
ordinary Hu or Huns, maybe in areas like deep socket eyes and high
nose bridge. A Turkic khan called Simo was not recommended for the
post of Turkic Arch-Khan because he looked more like an ordinary
'Hu' nomad than an Ashina Turk. This kind of records, however, did
corrobate the fact that these features were rare in relationship
with the general physique of the people in the area. Speculation
would be that majority Huns were of Mongol stock, but few Altaic
people, like Jiehu, had inherited or picked up Caucasian features of
Chinese Turkistan or Central Asia.
Orkhon Turks (Eastern Turks) were defeated by Uygurs. Uygurs would
control Kirghiz in the west and Khitans in the east. Around the 8th
century, the Kirghiz people would come into play. According to
Xin Wu Dai Shi (New History Of Five Dynasties), Kirghiz belonged
to the ancient 'Jiankun' Statelet which was located to the
western-most of the Huns, 7000 li away from the Hunnic court in
Mongolia, in fact. They should be to the west of Yiwu Statelet and
to the north of Yanqi Statelet. Hunnic Chanyu Zhizhi destroyed
Jiankun and ex-Han General Li Ling, who surrendered to the Huns, was
assigned to the land of Jiankun as King of Youxianwang (rightside
virtuous king) with an army of 80,000. "New History Of Five
Dynasties" said that Kirghiz possessed lighter skin, red hair, green
eyes and taller height, and that those Kirghiz with black hair must
be the descendants of Li Ling. At one time, during Tang Emperor
Suzong's reign of AD 758-760, the Huihu (Uygur) conquered the
Jiankun Statelet of the Kirghiz. The Kirghis allied themselves with
Tibetans, Arabs and Karlaks. Kirghiz, with the help of a traitor
Huihu (Uygur) general and combining a cavalry force of 100000,
defeated Huihu (Uygur) and killed the Huihu khan around AD 840s.
Kirghiz claimed that they shared the same last name as Tang
emperors, i.e., Li. They claimed to be descendants of General Li
Ling of 800 years earlier. They sent another emissary to Tang court,
and it took the emissary three years to circumvent to Tang court for
seeing Emperor Wuzong. Later, Kirghiz sent another emissary and made
a proposal to attack Huihu (Uygur) together with Tang. It would be
in AD 859 that Tang Emperor Xuandi decided to confer the Kirghiz the
title of Khan Bravery-Intelligence. Tang was hesitant in conferring
the king title and making Kirghiz an alternative rival to the
defunct Huihu power. Xin Wu Dai Shi said Kirghiz paid three
more pilgrimages during AD 860-875, but they failed to exterminate
Huihu (Uygur).
With the downfall of the Uygurs, the Khitans had their Uygur seal
replaced by Tang China and then ruled eastern Mongolia, most of
Manchuria, and much of northern China by AD 925. When the Kirghiz
defeated the Huihe (Uygurs) in AD 840 and took over northern
Mongolia, there was a group of people called the Naimans who
remained in their homalands in the Altai Mountains and attached
themselves to the Kirghiz. The Naimans is said to be a Mongol name
for a group of the Turkic tribe called 'Sakiz Oghuz' or the Eight
Oghuz, a name which existed in 8th century. Gradually, the Naimans
grew in strength and drove the Kirghiz to the River Yenesei and
rooted the Keraits from their homeland on the Irtysch in the Altai
and drove them towards Manchuria, hence indirectly causing the
Khitans to move to northern China where they established the Liao
Dynasty in AD 907-1125, a name associated with the Liao River in
Manchuria. The Khitans changed their dynastic names back and forth
between Liao and Khitan, several times. Khitans would conquer the Xi
and Shiwei Tribes, the Dadan Tribes, the Bohai Tungus people and the
Sino-Tibetan Tanguts.
After the fall of Tang Dynasty (AD 619-907), three dynasties among
the Five Dynasties (AD 907-960), Posterior Tang 923-936, Posterior
Jinn 936-946, Posterior Han 947-950, were ruled by the Sha'to Turks.
The remaining Orkhon Turks were not heard from after China's Five
Dynasties time period. Huihe (Uygurs or Uighurs) took refuge in
Ganzhou and Xinjiang after being replaced by the Kirghiz and
expelled from Mongolia.
During the 10th century, among over twenty Shiwei tribes, there
would be another interesting name called 'Huangdou Shiwei', i.e.,
yellow head Shiwei. Xin Wu Dai Shi, citing the account of a
Chinese (Hu Qiao) taken prisoner of war by Khitans, mentioned that
there were a statelet called Yujuelu with 'Maodou' (hairy head)
people to the northwest of Shiwei and to the north of the Kirghiz
people. Also to the northeast of Shiwei would be another group of
'Maoshou' or hairy head people.
Genghis Khan was rumored to have carried red hair and green eyes.
Paul Ratchnevsky quoted the contemporary Chinese Zhao Hong as saying
that Genghis Khan differed from other Tartars in that he was tall
and had long beard, and quoted Marco Polo as saying that Khubilai
did have black hair but fair complexion 'ringed with red'. Rashid
ad-Din, in 'Collected Chronicles', said that Genghis Khan was amazed
to see that Khubilai had black hair while the rest of their family
had red hair and said his grandson must have taken 'his old uncles'
features. Genghis Khan belonged to the Borjigid clan which was a
branch of the Kiyats to which the Jurchens (Jurchids), Changsi'ut
and the Kiyat-Sayar also belonged. The importance of the Borjigids
lies in the legend that after the death of Dobun-mergen, the alleged
ancestress Alan-ko bore Bodunchar after being visited by a strange
'golden glittering man'. Rashid ad-Din alluded to a foreign origin
of the visitor and described him as having red hair and blue-green
eyes. Paul Ratchnevsky speculated that the mysterious visitor could
be a Kirghiz since the Kirghiz people were said to be tall and
possessed red hair and green eyes. Note that Rashid ad-Din's
writings came from secondary sources and rumors and that Yuan Shi
(History of Yuan Dynasty) only recorded that Bodunchar had grey eyes
against the chestnut-colored eyes of his brothers and half-brothers.
Nothing is mentioned of hair or skin of Bodunchar or Genghis Khan.
My pointing out the above features had led some people to
speculation that ancient Chinese were not necessarily Chinese in
modern sense. Note important linguistic differentiation here. The
Yuezhi spoke Indo-European tongue should they be firmly classified
as Indo-European. The Chinese spoke Sino-Tibetan tongue. The Rong &
Di2 nomads, known as the later Huns and Turks, spoke the Altaic
tongue. I
would ask people to go to Xi'an and observe the terra cotta soldiers
for a clear idea as to how ancient Chinese looked like over 2300
years ago. To dispel racially polarized extrapolation, I had
discussed the issue of
Qin Chinese
ethnicity in Qin section. I explained why I consider Qin and
Zhou people as mainly Sino-Tibetan speaking Chinese versus the
Indo-European Yuezhi or Altaic-speaking steppe people; I had listed
two good examples to show that Qin/Zhou Chinese were not color-blind
people; and I searched early Chinese classics to extract the meaning
of blackness as coined in 'Qian Shou' and 'Li Min' for relation to
the skin, not the hair. To dispell any speculation, I had listed the
following sentence as a proof that ancient Chinese took pride in
hair's density and blackness as beauty and health: In classics
Zuo Zhuan, during the 28th year reign of Lu Lord Zhaogong, a
statement was made to infer that in the old times, a You-reng-shi
woman bored a beautiful daughter, with 'zhen[3] hei[1]' (i.e., dense
and black) hair.
|
|