|
Huns
Origins Of The Huns
Linguistic
Explorations
The Huns vs Eastern
Hu Nomads
Modu's Hun Empire
and Early Han Dynasty
Huns & the
Latter Han Dynasty
Huns During Wei-Jinn
Time Periods
Hunnic Han &
Zhao Dynasty (AD 304-329)
Five Nomad Groups
Ravaging China
Toba's Wei Dynasty,
Ruruans, & Hunnic Decline
Descriptions of
Non-Mongolian Physiques
Attila the Hun
Roman Legions Under Huns & Living In China
Distinction From The Turks & Uygurs
Uygurs & Karlaks vs Orkhon Turks
Uygurs vs Kirghiz
Distinction From "White Huns (Hephthalites)"
Yüeh-chih, Scythians, & Ye-tai (White Huns) |
|
HUNS: Linguistic Explorations |
A research via linguistics
could help in determining the ethnicity of the Huns. There are three
branches in the Altaic language family: Mongolian, Turkic and
Tunguzic. While Mongolian and Turkic share many similarities,
possibly because of the fact that the Mongolians relied on Uygur
Turks for creation of the Mongolian written language and consequent
inter-exchange, the Tunguzic branch is very much a separate branch
which would include today's Manchurians, Koreans and some
Yayoi-origin Japanese. Conventional wisdom points to some
speculation that the Huns belong to the Turkic branch. Though no
linguist existed at that time to study the Hun language, it seemed
that the Han Chinese had no difficulty in communicating with the
Huns. The Huns were very enthusiastic in retaining Chinese as
ministers in their court, and at one point in time, the Huns had
worn Chinese clothes sent over by the Han emperors. They discarded
the Chinese clothing after they were told that the Chinese emperors
tried to 'sinicize' them by tricking them into silk clothing instead
of the cavalry clothing. Most linguists assert that the Huns were
Turkic-speaking and they spoke some kind of Turkic language. My
point is that Altaic language family could be a derivative to
Tibetan branch of Sino-Tibetan language family as well as a
combinational product between Sino-Tibetan language family and
Indo-European language family. It could be a bold proposal to
suggest that the language branches did not distinguish themselves
till much later. While the Huns left no written language, the Turks
had possessed a so-called Orkhon scripts which, like the lost
languages of the Khitans, Tanguts and Jurchens, had all appeared to
contain some kind of revision on top of Chinese.
A simple comparison of some words in later
Mongolian
language yields the following interesting points: The word for the
Mongolinas, Mongqol irgen, is the same word 'irgen' as used
in ancient Chinese pronunciation which could be corrobated by the
Cantonese pronunciation of 'irgen' and Japanese pronuncitation of
'nin' or 'dgen'. Still more interesting is the fact that Genghis
Khan's name, Timuchin, shared the same prefix as some of his
brothers and sister, with Ti meaning nothing more than a
Chinese word 'Tie' for iron or smith. JOHANN WILHELM ADOLF KIRCHHOFF
(1826-1908) mentioned two Kara-Kirghiz groups, i.e., "the On or
"Right" in the east, with seven branches (Bogu, Sary-Bagishch,
Son-Bagishch, Sultu or Solye, Cherik, Sayak, Bassinz), and the Sol
or "Left" in the west, with four branches (Kokche or Kfichy, Soru,
Mundus, Kitai or Kintai)". As stated at
http://57.1911encyclopedia.org/K/KI/KIRGHIZ.htm, the "Sol
section occupies the region between the Talass and Oxus headstreams
in Ferghana (Khokand) and Bokhara, ... The On section lies on both
sides of the Tian-shan, about Lake Issyk-kul, and in the Chu, Tekes
and Narin (upper Jaxartes) valleys." Once again, ancient Chinese
words, like right for 'you' (mutated into 'on') and left for 'zuo'
(mutated into 'sol'), were adopted by nomadic tribes on the steppe.
Note that the Huns used to designate their officials into rightside
and leftside virtuous kings, similar to Qin Principality's adoption
of rightside and leftside prime ministers. Isenbike Togan of Middle
East Technical University stated that "written Chinese is also a
system of signs... Central Asian people who were not Chinese used
this system at some time in the past, including the Turks." Isenbike
Togan concluded that the Turkish word for 'freezing' came from
Chinese word 'dong[4]'. Reader jianx mentioned that "...many words
have similar sound and meaning as chinese -- the madarin... A few
examples: Chinese: Bo2: father's brother --> turkish: Bey: same
meaning( more general); Wa(1)Di(4): low land --> Vadi: valley;
Shui(3): water --> Sui: water; Jie(2): sister --> ajia: female
relative, sister. ...Turkish people have chinese last names. For
example, Turkish 'Tan' is obviously a chinese last name. In turkish,
it means 'sunrise', which is nearly identical to 'Dan(4)' in chinese
--- the Zhou Dynasty's famous Zhou(1)Gong(1) Dan(4) --- you should
know it means that the sun is rising over the horizon."
As to Turkic language, there had existed a much earlier version of
language than the Orkhon script. There is on record a poem written
by the wife of a Chinese officer under the Di[1] nomads' Anterior
Qin Dynasty (AD 351-394), and it was said that this love poem was
sent to her husband who was exiled to the border post on China's
silk road. The points to make here is that it was written in
so-called 'Hui Wen' language, namely, a terminology that was to be
used for denoting Turkic language later. Hui means something
self-looping or percolating, in a similar fashion to the Iranian
languages. The poem could be read from right to left and from left
to right.
However, languages should not be the determinant factor in
determining ethnicity since people could adopt other languages by
inter-exchanges. The so-called Turkic language was a term denoting
some common pronunciation components among the various nomadic
groups of peoples roaming the Euroasian continent, and it is exactly
due to this kind of mobility that could lead to the result that the
Magyar or Hungarian language (which belongs to the Finno-Ugric
family) contains many words of Turkish origin, relating to animal
husbandry and political and military organization.
It is said that the Magyars had migrated (c.460) from the Urals to
the Northern Caucasus region. Remained there for about 400 years,
they were allied with the Khazars of Turkish origin. Late in the 9th
cent, the Pechenegs forced the Magyars westward across Southern
Russia and into present Romania. They defeated the Bulgar czar
Simeon I, but Simeon, with the help of the Pechenegs, forced them
northward into Hungary where they permanently settled in AD 895.
They conquered Moravia and penetrated deep into Germany until they
were checked (955) by Holy Roman Emperor Otto I at the Lechfeld. The
terms Magyar and Hungarian are identical, but in non-Hungarian
languages the word Magyar is frequently used to distinguish the
Hungarian-speaking population of Hungary from the German, Slavic,
and Romanian minorities. Székely, ethnic group of Transylvania and
of present-day Romania, is another good example. The Székely (also
known as Szeklers or Siculi) came into Transylvania either with or
before the Magyars. Their organization was of the Turkic type, and
they are probably of Turkic (possibly Avar) stock. By the 11th
cent., however, they had adopted Magyar speech. Some scholars
disputed the word 'adopt' since they believe that Székely were of
Magyar family, related to one of the two sons of Attila the Hun.
Székely later formed one of three privileged nations of Transylvania
(the others were the Magyars and the Saxons).
The Huns vs Eastern
Hu Nomads NEXT
|
|