Comparing religion to spirituality
Many Westerners prefer to use the term spirituality rather than
religion to describe their form of belief. This may reflect a
large-scale disillusionment with organized religion that is
occurring in much of the Western world (see Religion in Modernity).
However, proponents of some forms of spirituality may represent a
movement towards a more "modern"—more tolerant, less
counter-factual, and more intuitive—form of religion. This is
evidenced by apparently greater religious pluralism and movements
such as the ecumenical movement within and transcending Christian
denominations. There are corresponding moderating movements within
Islam and other religious traditions.
In the East, however, spirituality is viewed as inseparable from
religion. The Indic religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and
Jainism) have always had incorporated into their very framework
primary focuses on spirituality. Yoga, for example, was a natural
outgrowth of the Vedic, Tantric, and Buddhist traditions, and is an
extremely detailed, rational, and scientific approach to developing
control of mind and body for the purpose of realizing spiritual
truths such as uniting with the Divine. It built into the structure
of scriptural injunctions and various cultural frameworks a
universal understanding of the divinity of man. Thus, we see that
spirituality has, in many Eastern religions, no separate existence.
Spirituality, in its Western comprehension, is religion cut loose
from some of its bureaucratic trappings. The concept is neutral with
regard to tolerance, etc. The same disillusionment often leads in
the opposite direction, toward intolerance and violence. Many
extreme sects lay claim to a higher spiritual basis. Some of those
professing to have attained a higher spiritual plane are actually
manipulative and intolerant.
It is possible, and perhaps advised, to keep in mind that there can
be a rigid distinction between the mundane, earthly aspects of
religion and the spiritual dimension. People can gain security from
such things as regular attendance at Church, deepening knowledge of
Scripture, and the social comfort of fervently agreeing with other
believers. This sometimes is done without a corresponding spiritual
dimension. Some people see this as being distant from God, but very
'religious'. Conversely those who consider themselves deeply
involved with the Divine may have come to reject much of the
recognised aspects of established religion. Indeed, some would feel
that this is central to the beliefs of the founders of some
religions: for example, Jesus was very critical of traditional
interpretations of the established Judaism, and the perceived
hypocrisy of some of its adherents at the time.
People disagree about whether religions have a spiritual or
supernatural basis; an example of this is the belief that the modern
ceremonies and canons of the Church have almost completely grown
away from, or even are contrary to, the presumed original Divine
revelation or source. This belief has arisen throughout history. One
example is found in pre-Reformation Christianity, when 'Indulgences'
(excusal of sin) were for sale, and corruption was endemic in Church
appointments. Today, some would hold that extreme religious
practices such as some punishments under Sharia law, or the
historical burning of heretics, was not at all what God intended.
Others find those practices repugnant to the secular ethics of a
modern liberal democracy.
Religion in certain faith-systems can therefore draw itself into
disrepute through the weaknesses of its practitioners, while
spirituality can be independently, but invisibly, strong and
flourishing. |